<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: marketing myopia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/</link>
	<description>stuff for your brain to chew on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: six months of stuff for your brain to chew on &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/comment-page-1/#comment-22947</link>
		<dc:creator>six months of stuff for your brain to chew on &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=3498#comment-22947</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing myopia was a post I wrote after reading an op-ed written by Larry Light, marketing guru and former McDonald’s CMO.  Larry had argued that marketing “needs to assert its rightful role making it the central force of brand-business management.” I questioned if the issue is whether marketers should try to increase the marketing function in the organization &#8212; or whether they should try to increase the marketing capability of the entire organization. Craig Hoffman wrote a couple of thoughtful responses – excerpts:  I&#8217;m a firm believer in making the marketing pervasive in an organization!  It only helps spread the message and reinforce the benefits of buying a product if everyone who comes in contact with the company gets a similar feeling… its up to management to keep the focus in the right place.  I think management has a role to create a belief for all employees about their company that makes them want to &#8220;sell&#8221; their company from all angles…I think companies who get this right will be more successful at generating and sustaining revenues with stronger margins, allowing for greater possible profits to retain!  Companies that &#8220;live their brand&#8221; come to mind &#8211; Google, Apple, Gore, Lululemon all come to mind as examples. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing myopia was a post I wrote after reading an op-ed written by Larry Light, marketing guru and former McDonald’s CMO.  Larry had argued that marketing “needs to assert its rightful role making it the central force of brand-business management.” I questioned if the issue is whether marketers should try to increase the marketing function in the organization &#8212; or whether they should try to increase the marketing capability of the entire organization. Craig Hoffman wrote a couple of thoughtful responses – excerpts:  I&#8217;m a firm believer in making the marketing pervasive in an organization!  It only helps spread the message and reinforce the benefits of buying a product if everyone who comes in contact with the company gets a similar feeling… its up to management to keep the focus in the right place.  I think management has a role to create a belief for all employees about their company that makes them want to &#8220;sell&#8221; their company from all angles…I think companies who get this right will be more successful at generating and sustaining revenues with stronger margins, allowing for greater possible profits to retain!  Companies that &#8220;live their brand&#8221; come to mind &#8211; Google, Apple, Gore, Lululemon all come to mind as examples. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig H</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/comment-page-1/#comment-18235</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=3498#comment-18235</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you - In fact its funny - my post above was the 2nd time I posted to the site - a freak internet accident made my first one disappear, and I didn&#039;t get it all in there the 2nd time around.

I made a reference in my first posting to the book &quot;the shift&quot; which I think nicely details exactly the problem you&#039;re talking about, and that this may be a critical moment in business management history for CMOs to get into the fray at the top level.  Marketing needs to be at the very top of the organization.  Without marketing as part of the senior leadership, then the brand as the business has too many risks to be shot down from an exec management perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you &#8211; In fact its funny &#8211; my post above was the 2nd time I posted to the site &#8211; a freak internet accident made my first one disappear, and I didn&#8217;t get it all in there the 2nd time around.</p>
<p>I made a reference in my first posting to the book &#8220;the shift&#8221; which I think nicely details exactly the problem you&#8217;re talking about, and that this may be a critical moment in business management history for CMOs to get into the fray at the top level.  Marketing needs to be at the very top of the organization.  Without marketing as part of the senior leadership, then the brand as the business has too many risks to be shot down from an exec management perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre-Loic Assayag</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/comment-page-1/#comment-18090</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre-Loic Assayag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=3498#comment-18090</guid>
		<description>&quot;brand as business&quot; has to be driven at the top in order to work, not by marketing.

Marketers see the future of their contribution being jeopardized, squeezed between Executive Management slashing budgets and customers much more vocal and opinionated about &quot;owning&quot; the brands they care about.

As a recovering marketer, my sense is that the marketing function probably has a very bright future but it needs to be fundamentally redefined. Successful marketers won&#039;t be defining the brand they represent but rather make themselves an indispensable resource to fans and brand advocates who will be the ones shaping the brand and probably products/services.

Twitter, Harley Davidson, Trader Joe&#039;s are some very interesting examples of fans taking over brands and very skillful marketers trading control for greater brand equity.

Food for thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;brand as business&#8221; has to be driven at the top in order to work, not by marketing.</p>
<p>Marketers see the future of their contribution being jeopardized, squeezed between Executive Management slashing budgets and customers much more vocal and opinionated about &#8220;owning&#8221; the brands they care about.</p>
<p>As a recovering marketer, my sense is that the marketing function probably has a very bright future but it needs to be fundamentally redefined. Successful marketers won&#8217;t be defining the brand they represent but rather make themselves an indispensable resource to fans and brand advocates who will be the ones shaping the brand and probably products/services.</p>
<p>Twitter, Harley Davidson, Trader Joe&#8217;s are some very interesting examples of fans taking over brands and very skillful marketers trading control for greater brand equity.</p>
<p>Food for thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig H</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2010/04/22/marketing-myopia/comment-page-1/#comment-17970</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=3498#comment-17970</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a firm believer in making the marketing pervasive in an organization!  It only helps spread the message and reinforce the benefits of buying a product if everyone who comes in contact with the company gets a similar feeling.

I&#039;ve also always loved that Drucker quote in particular.  I believe that businesses must administer themselves well in order to successfully retain profits, but the key word to me is &quot;retain.&quot;  Administration of business is about retaining cash flows that are created by the company - through innovation and marketing (convincing people to pay for the innovation!).  You can&#039;t retain profits if you don&#039;t have revenues, and the more committed to the company ALL of its people are, the more chances for the message to get out to customers.

I think that too much time and energy gets devoted to administration of a business because, well, its hard.  I think the problems of the administration can often drive time and energy allocations away from things that create revenues, and its up to management to keep the focus in the right place.  I think management has a role to create a belief for all employees about their company that makes them want to &quot;sell&quot; their company from all angles.

(That&#039;s the holy grail of course - when people see the brand as the business...  but I digress...)

I think companies who get this right will be more successful at generating and sustaining revenues with stronger margins, allowing for greater possible profits to retain!

Companies that &quot;live their brand&quot; come to mind - Google, Apple, Gore, Lululemon all come to  mind as examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a firm believer in making the marketing pervasive in an organization!  It only helps spread the message and reinforce the benefits of buying a product if everyone who comes in contact with the company gets a similar feeling.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also always loved that Drucker quote in particular.  I believe that businesses must administer themselves well in order to successfully retain profits, but the key word to me is &#8220;retain.&#8221;  Administration of business is about retaining cash flows that are created by the company &#8211; through innovation and marketing (convincing people to pay for the innovation!).  You can&#8217;t retain profits if you don&#8217;t have revenues, and the more committed to the company ALL of its people are, the more chances for the message to get out to customers.</p>
<p>I think that too much time and energy gets devoted to administration of a business because, well, its hard.  I think the problems of the administration can often drive time and energy allocations away from things that create revenues, and its up to management to keep the focus in the right place.  I think management has a role to create a belief for all employees about their company that makes them want to &#8220;sell&#8221; their company from all angles.</p>
<p>(That&#8217;s the holy grail of course &#8211; when people see the brand as the business&#8230;  but I digress&#8230;)</p>
<p>I think companies who get this right will be more successful at generating and sustaining revenues with stronger margins, allowing for greater possible profits to retain!</p>
<p>Companies that &#8220;live their brand&#8221; come to mind &#8211; Google, Apple, Gore, Lululemon all come to  mind as examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

