<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a case against user-generated ad contests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/09/10/a-case-against-user-generated-ad-contests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/09/10/a-case-against-user-generated-ad-contests/</link>
	<description>stuff for your brain to chew on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: consumers as creatives &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/09/10/a-case-against-user-generated-ad-contests/comment-page-1/#comment-19843</link>
		<dc:creator>consumers as creatives &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=2234#comment-19843</guid>
		<description>[...] related post:  a case against user-generated ad contests [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] related post:  a case against user-generated ad contests [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Pietz</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/09/10/a-case-against-user-generated-ad-contests/comment-page-1/#comment-7268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Pietz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=2234#comment-7268</guid>
		<description>I agree. In may ways a brand is a reflection of a company&#039;s personality. Why would you let someone else convey your personality for you? It&#039;s like saying &quot;You kind of know me. Tell me what I think.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. In may ways a brand is a reflection of a company&#8217;s personality. Why would you let someone else convey your personality for you? It&#8217;s like saying &#8220;You kind of know me. Tell me what I think.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Duffy</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/09/10/a-case-against-user-generated-ad-contests/comment-page-1/#comment-7261</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Duffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=2234#comment-7261</guid>
		<description>This campaign gimmick has already past its &quot;use before&quot; date. When UGC was new I think the buzz surrounding these campaigns made up for the short comings you have mentioned. But USG-campaign content is no longer new, so I don&#039;t think it makes the brand look innovative or otherwise contributes much to brand equity. I just think you wind up with a mediocre spot (from a strategic standpoint). I think Bud would be wiser to invest in a campaign concept that is both engaging and innovative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This campaign gimmick has already past its &#8220;use before&#8221; date. When UGC was new I think the buzz surrounding these campaigns made up for the short comings you have mentioned. But USG-campaign content is no longer new, so I don&#8217;t think it makes the brand look innovative or otherwise contributes much to brand equity. I just think you wind up with a mediocre spot (from a strategic standpoint). I think Bud would be wiser to invest in a campaign concept that is both engaging and innovative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

