<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gm is driving by looking in the rearview mirror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/04/13/gm-is-driving-by-looking-in-the-rearview-mirror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/04/13/gm-is-driving-by-looking-in-the-rearview-mirror/</link>
	<description>stuff for your brain to chew on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Hartjen</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/04/13/gm-is-driving-by-looking-in-the-rearview-mirror/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Hartjen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=1423#comment-996</guid>
		<description>Ah, where to begin with GM?  I’m not sure they’re driving with an eye in the rear view mirror.  Yes, they might be looking in the rear view mirror, but it appears they’ve been in “Park” for years now.  Too many years of trying to avoid going in reverse maybe?  Customers push changes in the marketplace much too quickly for that.  It’s an interesting business story with deep roots in politics - and getting deeper by the week.  If nothing else, the next month will be an interesting study of the dialgoue between debt holders, equity holders, politicians, and voters.  I suppose it&#039;s much too late to call a mulligan on this thing and start with a “do over?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, where to begin with GM?  I’m not sure they’re driving with an eye in the rear view mirror.  Yes, they might be looking in the rear view mirror, but it appears they’ve been in “Park” for years now.  Too many years of trying to avoid going in reverse maybe?  Customers push changes in the marketplace much too quickly for that.  It’s an interesting business story with deep roots in politics &#8211; and getting deeper by the week.  If nothing else, the next month will be an interesting study of the dialgoue between debt holders, equity holders, politicians, and voters.  I suppose it&#8217;s much too late to call a mulligan on this thing and start with a “do over?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/04/13/gm-is-driving-by-looking-in-the-rearview-mirror/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=1423#comment-993</guid>
		<description>This an awesome post about a tragic situation; I&#039;d say they are worse than reactive, they are (as happened with the congressional hearings, I think) defending their previous and current behavior and looking for reasons not to change, articulating to us (and each other), even as the ship sinks, that they are in fact, right. Really sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This an awesome post about a tragic situation; I&#8217;d say they are worse than reactive, they are (as happened with the congressional hearings, I think) defending their previous and current behavior and looking for reasons not to change, articulating to us (and each other), even as the ship sinks, that they are in fact, right. Really sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

