<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: losing more than a brand name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/</link>
	<description>stuff for your brain to chew on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: a tale of two rebrands: syfy and starbucks &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-6173</link>
		<dc:creator>a tale of two rebrands: syfy and starbucks &#124; denise lee yohn: brand as business bites™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=882#comment-6173</guid>
		<description>[...] losing more than a brand name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] losing more than a brand name [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Earl Wilsher</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Earl Wilsher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=882#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Definitely not easy to decide. 

Read Mr. Paul&#039;s book: Copy This! Great read on the origin of Kinkos.

~Ronald
True Believer &amp; Hope Dealer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not easy to decide. </p>
<p>Read Mr. Paul&#8217;s book: Copy This! Great read on the origin of Kinkos.</p>
<p>~Ronald<br />
True Believer &amp; Hope Dealer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Hull</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Hull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=882#comment-136</guid>
		<description>It appears the Ex in FedEx came to mean more than shipping and it that doesn&#039;t include Extension. Paul Orfalea is right, Kinko&#039;s was a brand FedEx squandered for lack of understanding brand elasticity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears the Ex in FedEx came to mean more than shipping and it that doesn&#8217;t include Extension. Paul Orfalea is right, Kinko&#8217;s was a brand FedEx squandered for lack of understanding brand elasticity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/2009/01/08/losing-more-than-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseleeyohn.com/bites/?p=882#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I strongly suspect there was one reason for dropping the name Kinko&#039;s which outweighed all others, namely that it had no inherent marketing synergy for FedEx&#039;s foremost business, shipping. Sure it was a powerful brand name, but it was evident from the day the acquisition was announced in 2004 that the once venerable name Kinko&#039;s was designated for eventual extinction. Lackluster performance in the last four years was the reason the name was dropped sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly suspect there was one reason for dropping the name Kinko&#8217;s which outweighed all others, namely that it had no inherent marketing synergy for FedEx&#8217;s foremost business, shipping. Sure it was a powerful brand name, but it was evident from the day the acquisition was announced in 2004 that the once venerable name Kinko&#8217;s was designated for eventual extinction. Lackluster performance in the last four years was the reason the name was dropped sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

